GROSS MISUSE OF IPC 498a- WHY SUPREME COURT HAS TO INTERVENE ??

The recent landmark judgement by SC on IPC 498a Misuse and Arrests under this section has sparked fresh debate on credibility of 498a. The indian  feminists and Women bodies are crying it foul without going into legal prepositions & wisdom . They are still not ready to accept the principal of natural justice in the crimes against women. They are so critical of this order as if this order will doom  their economic & social future. They are feeling the heat of  loosing their support base.

However, on the other side, the post below is a detailed analysis(with facts & figures from authorized sources) of  Why Supreme Court has to intervene :-

http://sffdelhitrainingsessions.blogspot.in/2014/07/NCRBArneshSupremeCourt.html

CRIME IS CRIME 

CRIME IS NOT COMMITTED BY GENDER BUT BY A CRIMINAL MIND….

Undermining MAN – the BIGGEST IGNORANCE

A Man for centuries is an easy target  to criticize & blame and is   bearing the heat of criticism and brand labeling as a predator, ignoring the  very fact that it is MAN who has :

• Strived hard since the stone age  to meet hunger, luxury, protection and social standing of  his family, thereby a society, a nation & the world.

• Run the world and always have; men are smarter, stronger, and more aggressive than women; feminists could never have got anything they wanted if men hadn’t permitted them to have it.

• Made the life outside home easy by investing both physically as un-tired labour and intellectually as technology. Before invention of many machines & tools, a lot of work required more muscle power than women have; their engaging in it was impossible before men made it easier.

• The MEN besides playing a successful role of caretaker for his family has gifted this world with all kind of  amenities alongwith honor and dignity out of his own sweat and un-tiring energy.The Man has sacrificed his life for protection and honor of his family for centuries.

• The Man has never done anything exclusively for himself or for his individual development or ease but has done everything for whole of the society & world.

• Surprisingly, now when outside world is made so easy to be in, by MAN, the unscrupulous identities called “Feminists” started crying women rights, equality, deprivation etc. etc. Why not this hue & cry was there, when  livelihood or survival  was hard and manual fatigue and great endurance was involved in every single action outside ?

• More ironically, theses feminists  want to achieve their so called equality, empowerment etc. by blaming everything on the very MAN who has relentlessly strived hard for whole society in general.

• Even today, the poor MAN is so deeply involved in fulfilling his old traditional duties and responsibilities that HE knowingly, but due to ages old cultivated sense of being provider & protector is ignoring the very fact that the time has come when he need to join hands and come together to fight against these feminists and the governments run by them who are misleading the world for their ulterior motives and are proving fatal to the family & society for which he is striving so hard.

It is the call of day that the Men being PROTECTOR & PROVIDER, raise his voice loud & clear that IT IS I WHO HAD  MADE THIS WORLD LIVABLE & ORDERLY by  putting in immense Labour & hardship and I WILL NOT ALLOW TO DISCARD OR RUIN MY EFFORTS & LOBOUR on the WHIMS & FANCIES OF FEMINISTS.

COME  & FIGHT FOR MEN’s RIGHTS !

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,2005 – A complete eyewash by feminists.

In the era of gender biased Acts and laws viz. 498a,DV,CrPC 125, Divorce, Child custody, Dowry Death, sexual harassment etc. in India when Men’s organisations like SIF demands for any genuine amendment, penalty clauses for misuse in these gender biased laws or  making these laws gender neutral everyone right from government, judiciary & feminists use to put forth an argument that the affected persons or cases are very few and far and small affecting section of persons cannot be the base for any amendment or framing of any new gender neutral laws.

Come, let us postmortem their argument .

However, when the feminists and government (for free funding & power respectively) desired  to frame a gender biased law in the name of protection to women from domestic violence, they have acted contrary to their above argument and enforced a very clumsily drafted gender biased law called “ Protection of women from Domestic Violence Act,2005”. In this title of Act, everybody be it Government, feminists, society or legal fraternity should give importance to the two most important words i.e  “Woman” & “Domestic Violence”.

No one can deny that, Mother-in-Laws, sister-in laws and other females in husband’s family are too Women and besides living in a Domestic relationship also forms a big section of women in society.

So either this Act should have been named as “Protection of Wife from Domestic Violence” or all women in domestic relation including Mother-in-law, Sister-in-law & other females in husband’s family should be given protection under this Act.

Then the Big question remains, why this Act is named as Protection of Women from Domestic Violence ?

The truth is, this is done just to maligning the perception of society & government by falsely showing/projecting a broad coverage under this Act and to maliciously justifying the protection need to a larger section of society by way of this most clumsily and ill intentionally framed Law. This Act bears the name as if this Act is meant to provide protection to all women in India(i.e 48-50%population).

“Whereas, in India, almost 48-50 % is the total women population out of which if we exclude unmarried girls, old aged women, mother-in laws and sister-in-laws (which are not covered under this Act) I am sure this Act is made to protect only 10-20 % of women in the society. Whereas the misuse of this Act can very well drastically affect almost 80 % of total society.”

So, How justifiable is the wisdom of our Government or law makers ?

When a special Act(PWDVA) which lacks the balance of natural justice and is direct violative of fundamental right of life & liberty can be enforced for fairly very small section of society, why not, any genuine amendment, penalty clause for misuse or new law can be framed as is being demanded by the Men’s organization SIF?

An Indian Male amidst Feminists & NCW

 In great Indian family system, an Indian Male since from ancient time was made responsible for feeding, caring, protecting and raising his family as he was the only one who was capable of these all duties due to socio-economic, cultural and traditional way of living and social fabric of society. However, in order to strengthen his these capabilities, this Indian Male was provided with many rights over his family matters and decisions and the family system in India was flourishing and remained intact.

 Since the start of 19^th century in colonial times, a social reform movement to uplift the   women’s position in society took off which successfully addressed some of social evil prevailing that time on large scale in Indian society like Sati, child marriage, purdha pratha etc. this movement remain active till in 1920s and afterward it took more modern face with many strong females like Sarojini Naidu, Vijaya lakshmi Pandit, Indira Ghandi etc. marked their presence at the time of freedom struggle. The focus of this women movement was primarily on social reforms to uplift the stature of woman socially and economically in society and the contributors for this cause were called as Social Reformists and were Males mostly.

 But, after the freedom and in 1970s, this social reform movement fell into the hands of  new termed “ feminists”(mostly urban women) and they start emphasizing on more & more  rights to women making rural India and age old traditions/conditions of women in society a ground for their demands. The worst part of it was that they boosted their movement through spreading hatred against Male gender in the society. Slowly but steadily, the earlier social reform movement has been turned into so called “Women empowerment” by these feminists and a “National Commission for Women” (NCW) was formed in the year 1992 in India. This development has proved a biggest blunder on gender equality in nation. The feminists & NCW, instead of bringing in social reforms for safeguarding the position of true needy women of Indian society by emphasizing on true womanhood and it’s important role in society through awareness and discussions in society has indulged in the mad race of competing with the Male in each & every sphere, on the way, forgetting about the in-built physiological, mental, social capabilities and  responsibilities attributed to the genders by mother Nature.

 The NCW alongwith feminists instead of bringing in changes through awareness and discussions in the society has played an instrumental role in forcing the government to enact & enforce more & more gender biased laws like 498a, DV Act, Maintenance etc.  for which

•  They present cooked & false studies and data
• Cites  & takes up only favorable, selected, isolated issues/examples from rural India and Converts any issue involving a woman into a gender issue.
• Keeps alive, some old social evils like dowry, atrocities etc. in order to continue encashing on civil sentiments in society.
• Never ready to accept any positive change in Women’s social & economical status in society over the last 30-40 years.
• Never want a society to have a perception of a Indian woman as a self reliant and independent woman
• Never talks about responsibilities of a women but only claims rights.

 This resulted in rampant misuse of all these laws by specially urban women who are trapping the undue benefits from these laws. This evil  agenda of feminists and NCW  is delivering nothing good to the society but is a reason for breaking up of families, drawing lines on gender base, increase in matrimonial crimes, diminishing ethics & values, distorting culture & traditions in Indian society and is mainly responsible for wastage of Government resources & public money alongwith ever piling-up of the fraudulent cases in Indian courts.

 This dubious role of NCW  & feminists is quite clear from the functioning/working of NCW itself, a body which claims to be custodian of women rights in India and the great Indian Government follows the suggestions and advices from this body in enacting & enforcing gender biased laws in India.

 The excerpts from CAG inspection Report 2008-09 on NCW functioning/working is here:

 http://commandos.in/wiki/_media/rti/real/central/dept/cag/cagreportonncw/9.jpg

http://commandos.in/wiki/_media/rti/real/central/dept/cag/cagreportonncw/10.jpg

 Surely, the demand of social, economical and political equal rights to women is not against the natural justice but the modus-operandi of NCW & feminists who overwhelmingly  spreading Male hatred in society by catching hold of age-old social problems and justifying them in present era with cooked & frivolous data is certainly a misconceived and mischievous act on their part.

Equal rights to all in a society, is a mark of civilized society but the agenda of these NCW & feminists is to infringe the equal rights of Male and tilt the gender balance in society so as to provide unduly rights to unscrupulous women especially urban women. In this process of pseudo Women empowerment and misuse of gender biased matrimonial laws, the NCW & feminists are deliberately causing a collateral damage to the identity of an Indian Male and his role as “husband” in the society which in-turn will definitely prove fatal to family system in India.

On the one side, the responsibilities of a husband in society is still remained intact (what it was in age-old society  i.e. feeding, caring, protecting and raising his family) but his rights thereof has been infringed upon drastically and now he suffers/strives even to have fair and equal gender rights in matrimonial affairs and family while on the other side, wife, is legally made free from any kind of responsibilities of matrimony and enjoying one-sided and full rights to dictate her terms or break the family without any penalty. 

This becomes more clear when we analyze the present scenario of Indian society from an unbiased mind:

The so called women empowerment has ensured(socially as well as legally) equal rights to earn and opportunities to women with many upliftment policies and programmes like, free education, award schemes for female Childs, support for training & employment, Stree Shakti Programme, gender budgeting, short stay shelters, women’s right in paternal property, reservation in political sphere(panchayats, vidhan sabha, loksabha etc.) and also the government is spending overwhelmingly for so many years for these activities. Whereas, the earning avenues for Males which were earlier mainly available to him, is now shared 50-50 or even more by females (this all, while the population is ever growing) this resulted in less than 50% earning avenues left with Males, so in this present scenario Why only male is still made responsible for maintaining his family ?

On fair ground, in today’s context, a Marriage is a contract between two individuals to discharge equal responsibilities and avail equal rights to make a successful family, the same should also be true in case of a failed marriage(without going into the reasons Why?), but in India, failed marriage is made a liability of Male only, Why? He has to pay maintenance during dispute or alimony after divorce Why? When the same marriage is broken and both are not discharging their responsibilities of that matrimony.

 So, isn’t it rational that either Government should scrap all women upliftment so called women empowerment, NCW etc. if these not bearing the desired fruits or it should make women legally, equally responsible at par with Males in the family affairs and matrimonial matters alongwith a parallel statutory constitutional bodies for male rights too?

No, India can’t be a dowry free State

Many decades has been passed since  enforcing of Dowry Prohibition Act,1961, in India but still it is claimed by the NCW and Government that Dowry menace is ever increasing in the society as the cases registered under this Act is increasing. The NCW & Government needs introspection here about their stats and wisdom.

If it’s so, then Why India is not able to eliminate this dowry menace from it’s society ?. Here, I have the answer:

India can’t be a dowry free State

1. Until National Commission for Women(NCW) is close down or disoriented.
2. Until Country is not forced to be run by feminists.
3. Until legislatures change their feministic view about family & marriage matters.
4. Until Courts realize their duty to take cognizance of Perjury (if any) against parents of bride.
5. Until the dowry givers are punished.
6. Until  the  IPC 498a is scraped.
7. Until  the word “dowry”  is used for every trouble caused to a woman.
8. Until every death of married women is termed as Dowry Death.
9. Until  unscrupulous women are entitled for  maintenance.
10. Until child custody is primarily the right of woman.
11. Until Domestic violence is attributed only to husband.
12. Until matrimonial laws are gender biased.
13. Until Woman Empowerment is done at the cost of womanhood.
14. Until false allegations has edge over truth legally.
15. Until  Men Welfare Ministry is formed.
16. Until the existence of  myth that India is a male dominating society.

And also

Until a true gender neutral  study & research is done on violence in family & matrimonial matters.

Am I Wrong ?

Women Reservation Bill-a big consiparacy of radical feminists

THE RATIONALE BEHIND WRB

The WRB- is a big consiparacy of radical feminists. Reserving 33% seats for women  on rotation for 5 years is a big political  blunder in INDIA. Due to this ill thought reservation, the male parliamenterian will face extinction in political system of India (so called world’s largest DEMOCRACY).

  Consider Below: 33% Reservation to women means ——-

Take for example there is  only 3 seats in parliament after WRB (33% reservation to Women)

FIRST ELECTION

First seat reserved so any woman and only woman will be elected. Situation will be 1:2(female : male)

SECOND ELECTION after 5 years

 first seat will be open but again the woman won earlier must have garnered strong support to her in her constituency and she will again contest and most likely to win. Now the 2nd seat will be  reserved for woman so only woman will win on this seat . SO AFTER 5 YEARs there will be 2 women against these 3 seats and its 66%. 2:1(Female:male)

THIRD ELECTION after 10 years

Now the women earlier contested and won  on 1 & 2nd seats in earlier elections will be having strong possibility of wining or retaining their repective seats as they have done or served the constituency and they will again contest on these seats as these seats will be open.

Now the remaining 3rd seat will be reserved for women so only women can win.

 So in all the 3 seats there will be women and its 99% women. 3:0(female:male)

 Now, see after (3 elections)15 years there will be hardly any male parliamenterian in idle situation. This is the actual rationale behind this WRB. Now those (Males) who are with the Women reservation please apply mind and act accordingly.